Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45979
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThermal performance of a circular perforated panel personalized ventilation system: Thermal manikin measurement and tropically acclimatised people's response
dc.contributor.authorSun, W.
dc.contributor.authorZhou, W.
dc.contributor.authorTham, K.W.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T04:45:12Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T04:45:12Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationSun, W.,Zhou, W.,Tham, K.W. (2006). Thermal performance of a circular perforated panel personalized ventilation system: Thermal manikin measurement and tropically acclimatised people's response. HB 2006 - Healthy Buildings: Creating a Healthy Indoor Environment for People, Proceedings 4 : 293-297. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.isbn9789899506718
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45979
dc.description.abstractThe thermal performance of a circular perforated panel (CPP) for personalized ventilation (PV) system in an indoor environment chamber was examined using a breathing thermal manikin and tropically acclimatized subjects. Supplying treated outdoor air, the PV systems were adjusted according to experimental conditions which were designed in a balanced matrix, and presented blind to the subjects. The mean values of subjective evaluation indices, i.e., inhaled air temperature perception and acceptability of facial air movement, were compared with the inhalation temperature and draft risk obtained from objective measurements of the manikin. The perceived inhaled air temperature (PAT) is mainly determined by ambient-PV temperature combinations, and PAT was found to correlate linearly with the measured breathing manikin's inhaled temperature (R2 = 0.75). PV air supply temperature dominated PAT in Low- Tu conditions, while High-Tu PAT depended more on ambient temperature. The acceptability of facial air movement of tropically acclimatized people depends on facial air velocity, ambient-PV temperature combination and turbulence intensity. The most acceptable facial air movement increases with the ambient temperature. At 26°C ambient environment, a facial air velocity between 0.5-0.7m/s was most preferred, compared to 0.5-0.6m/s at 23.5°C environment when PV air was supplied with low turbulence intensity.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectHuman perception
dc.subjectPersonalized ventilation
dc.subjectThermal manikin
dc.subjectTropics
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.description.sourcetitleHB 2006 - Healthy Buildings: Creating a Healthy Indoor Environment for People, Proceedings
dc.description.volume4
dc.description.page293-297
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.