Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparing the performance of design-build and design-bid-build building projects in Singapore|
|Authors:||Ling, F.Y.Y. |
|Citation:||Ling, F.Y.Y.,Kerh, S.H. (2004). Comparing the performance of design-build and design-bid-build building projects in Singapore. Architectural Science Review 47 (2) : 163-176. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||Design-build(DB) and design-bid-build(DBB) are two of the most common project delivery systems used in many countries. Which delivery system to use may depend on how well the project could perform under each system. The aim of this study is to empirically compare the performance of projects which used these two procurement systems. Project performance is operationalised into 14 metrics. Data were collected from 107 building projects in Singapore. The main finding is that in most instances, there is no significant difference between the performance of DB and DBB projects. Some of the limited difference include: DB projects have higher delivery speed in general; and DB office projects are easier to commission than DBB projects. The implication of the findings is that there is a need to look beyond procurement system to control project performance.|
|Source Title:||Architectural Science Review|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 22, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.