Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45404
Title: Intoxication is never a defence
Authors: Simester, A.P. 
Keywords: Basic intent
Criminal liability
Specific intent
Voluntary intoxication
Issue Date: 2009
Source: Simester, A.P. (2009). Intoxication is never a defence. Criminal Law Review (1) : 3-14. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: This article considers the intoxication doctrine, including whether it is evidential or substantive in nature, and what work is done by the basic-versusspecific intent distinction. Most importantly, the article analyses the structure of the doctrine itself. Sometimes thought of as a defence, the article argues that it is an entirely different kind of doctrine, one that imposes constructive liability upon offenders. Once this is seen, we can better assess its rightful place in the law. © 2009 THOMSON REUTERS (LEGAL) LIMITED.
Source Title: Criminal Law Review
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45404
ISSN: 0011135X
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

401
checked on Dec 15, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.