1. ScholarBank@NUS
  2. 1. Staff
  3. Staff Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCorrecting unjust enrichments
dc.contributor.authorSimester, A.P.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-12T13:36:51Z
dc.date.available2013-10-12T13:36:51Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationSimester, A.P. (2010). Correcting unjust enrichments. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3) : 579-598. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024
dc.identifier.issn01436503
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45403
dc.description.abstractThis review article examines R Chambers, C Mitchell and J Penner (eds), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. These sophisticated essays suggest that a corrective, bipolar analysis of autonomous unjust enrichment is broadly right. However, the normative rationale is complex. From the plaintiff's perspective, there are autonomy-based grounds for drawing an analogy to voidable rather than void property transactions. For similar reasons, the role of a corresponding-enrichment requirement primarily concerns identification of the defendant rather than establishing injustice. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentLAW
dc.description.doi10.1093/ojls/gqq024
dc.description.sourcetitleOxford Journal of Legal Studies
dc.description.volume30
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page579-598
dc.identifier.isiut000289289200007
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.