Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparative advertising: Superiority despite interference?|
|Authors:||Ang, S.-H. |
|Source:||Ang, S.-H.,Leong, S.-M. (1994). Comparative advertising: Superiority despite interference?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 11 (1) : 33-46. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731871|
|Abstract:||The effect of comparative versus noncomparative advertising on consumer cognitions, attitudes, and behavioural intentions toward an advertised brand with or without interference from other ads was investigated. The experimental results indicated that the superiority of comparative over noncomparative advertising on attitudinal and behavioural intention responses observed immediately after exposure diminished following interference from subsequent exposure to other ads. However, its superiority on two cognitive dimensions - perceived brand similarity and quality - was maintained despite such interference. Implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed. © 1994 Faculty of Business Administration National University of Singapore.|
|Source Title:||Asia Pacific Journal of Management|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 9, 2018
checked on Jan 12, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.