Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731871
Title: Comparative advertising: Superiority despite interference?
Authors: Ang, S.-H. 
Leong, S.-M. 
Issue Date: 1994
Source: Ang, S.-H.,Leong, S.-M. (1994). Comparative advertising: Superiority despite interference?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 11 (1) : 33-46. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731871
Abstract: The effect of comparative versus noncomparative advertising on consumer cognitions, attitudes, and behavioural intentions toward an advertised brand with or without interference from other ads was investigated. The experimental results indicated that the superiority of comparative over noncomparative advertising on attitudinal and behavioural intention responses observed immediately after exposure diminished following interference from subsequent exposure to other ads. However, its superiority on two cognitive dimensions - perceived brand similarity and quality - was maintained despite such interference. Implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed. © 1994 Faculty of Business Administration National University of Singapore.
Source Title: Asia Pacific Journal of Management
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45122
ISSN: 02174561
DOI: 10.1007/BF01731871
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Jan 9, 2018

Page view(s)

74
checked on Jan 12, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.