Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Incentivizing R & D: Prize or subsidies?|
|Authors:||Fu, Q. |
|Citation:||Fu, Q., Lu, J., Lu, Y. (2012). Incentivizing R & D: Prize or subsidies?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 30 (1) : 67-79. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||This paper studies the optimal design of R&D contests. A "sponsor" (e.g. the US Department of Defense or the World Health Organization) wants to improve the quality of the winning products. To do so, it partitions its budget between two schemes: an inducement prize and efficiency-enhancing subsidies to the firms competing in the contest. Prizes and subsidies have different functions, and they provide complementary incentives. In the optimally designed contest, subsidies increase while the prize decreases, if the innovation process is more challenging. Further, sensible conditions are identified under which the optimal contest implements either a "handicapping" scheme (by preferentially subsidizing the "underdog") or a "national champion" scheme (by favoring the "favorite"). Our analysis yields a number of useful implications and sheds light on an array of R&D incentive schemes, such as the DoD's design competitions and vaccine development incentives. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||International Journal of Industrial Organization|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 28, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Dec 26, 2018
checked on Feb 2, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.