Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0177-6
Title: Opportunistic customer claiming during service recovery
Authors: Wirtz, J. 
McColl-Kennedy, J.R.
Keywords: Cheating
Claiming
Justice
Opportunistic customer behavior
Service recovery
Issue Date: 2010
Source: Wirtz, J., McColl-Kennedy, J.R. (2010). Opportunistic customer claiming during service recovery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38 (5) : 654-675. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0177-6
Abstract: Although a potentially significant issue to managers and academics alike, opportunistic customer behavior in the service recovery context has been largely ignored. A multi-stage research program, comprising actual customer claims (Study 1), in depth customer interviews (Study 2) and three experimental studies (Studies 3, 4, 5), explored opportunistic customer claiming behavior during service recovery and yielded robust findings across methods, contexts and samples. Potential determinants of opportunistic claiming in a service recovery context were identified by drawing on the justice, self-concept maintenance and neutralization theories. The findings support the hypothesis that when experiencing lower distributive, procedural and interactional justice, respondents were more likely to be opportunistic in their claiming. Further more, consumers were more likely to be opportunistic when dealing with large compared to small firms, and when they were in one-time transactions compared to when they had an established relationship with the firm. Finally, increased claiming in general, and opportunistic claiming in particular, did not lead to increased satisfaction with the service recovery. © 2009 Academy of Marketing Science.
Source Title: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/43899
ISSN: 00920703
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-009-0177-6
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
checked on Dec 7, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

38
checked on Nov 22, 2017

Page view(s)

71
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.