Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.421
Title: Differences in perspective and the influence of charitable appeals: When imagining oneself as the victim is not beneficial
Authors: Hung, I.W. 
Wyer Jr., R.S.
Keywords: Charitable appeals
Helping behavior
Information processing
Nonprofit marketing
Processing fluency
Issue Date: 2009
Source: Hung, I.W.,Wyer Jr., R.S. (2009). Differences in perspective and the influence of charitable appeals: When imagining oneself as the victim is not beneficial. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (3) : 421-434. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.421
Abstract: Advertisements often stimulate consumers to imagine themselves in a situation in which they would personally benefit from using the product being advertised. However, when an advertisement is intended to induce consumers to benefit someone else (e.g., to donate money for relief of disaster victims), stimulating them to imagine themselves in the situation confronting the beneficiary can sometimes conflict with the image they form of themselves as a potential helper. This conflict in imagined perspective can decrease the advertisement's effectiveness. Five studies confirm this hypothesis. When participants took the perspective of the beneficiary at the time they read an appeal for help, characteristics of the appeal that increased the ease with which they could imagine the situation from this perspective (e.g., a picture of the victim) had a positive effect on both their urge to help and the amount of money they donated. However, when they had an a priori disposition to take the perspective of a potential donor at the time they read the appeal, these same characteristics decreased the appeal's effectiveness.
Source Title: Journal of Marketing Research
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/43850
ISSN: 00222437
DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.421
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Dec 12, 2017

Page view(s)

61
checked on Dec 7, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.