Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality?|
|Authors:||Xu, Y. |
|Citation:||Xu, Y., Chen, Z. (2006). Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (7) : 961-973. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20361|
|Abstract:||How does an information user perceive a document as relevant? The literature on relevance has identified numerous factors affecting such a judgment. Taking a cognitive approach, this study focuses on the criteria users employ in making relevance judgment beyond topicality. On the basis of Grice's theory of communication, we propose a five-factor model of relevance: topicality, novelty, reliability, understandability, and scope. Data are collected from a semicontrolled survey and analyzed by following a psychometric procedure. Topicality and novelty are found to be the two essential relevance criteria. Understandability and reliability are also found to be significant, but scope is not. The theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed.|
|Source Title:||Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Oct 12, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Oct 3, 2018
checked on Oct 13, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.