Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20453
Title: Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior
Authors: Lin, J. 
Chan, H.C. 
Wei, K.K.
Issue Date: 2006
Source: Lin, J., Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K. (2006). Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (10) : 1338-1349. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20453
Abstract: User acceptance models such as the technology acceptance model, the theory of reasoned action, and the theory of planned behavior have been widely used to study a specific information system, a group of systems, or even computers in general. This study examines the usage of competitive information systems. It applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in a comparative frame of reference model (relative model) in which relative attitude, relative subjective norm, relative intention, and relative usage are examined. The study is set in the context of two instant messaging technologies. Based on a survey from 300 instant messaging users, the effects of attitude and subjective norm on intention in each model were different (i.e., when TPB is tested once for each application). This confirms that the behavioral model can show different effects for competitive products. In addition, correct competitive answers were given by the relative model; however, these may differ from the answers found from a single application model. The authors show the importance of studying the relative model for competitive products.
Source Title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/42380
ISSN: 15322882
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20453
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Dec 7, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
checked on Nov 29, 2017

Page view(s)

50
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.