Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2008.07-004-R2-06-57
Title: A twin-candidate model for learning-based anaphora resolution
Authors: Yang, X.
Su, J.
Tan, C.L. 
Issue Date: 2008
Source: Yang, X., Su, J., Tan, C.L. (2008). A twin-candidate model for learning-based anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 34 (3) : 327-356. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2008.07-004-R2-06-57
Abstract: The traditional single-candidate learning model for anaphora resolution considers the antecedent candidates of an anaphor in isolation, and thus cannot effectively capture the preference relationships between competing candidates for its learning and resolution. To deal with this problem, we propose a twin-candidate model for anaphora resolution. The main idea behind the model is to recast anaphora resolution as a preference classification problem. Specifically, the model learns a classifier that determines the preference between competing candidates, and, during resolution, chooses the antecedent of a given anaphor based on the ranking of the candidates. We present in detail the framework of the twin-candidate model for anaphora resolution. Further, we explore how to deploy the model in the more complicated coreference resolution task. We evaluate the twin-candidate model in different domains using the Automatic Content Extraction data sets. The experimental results indicate that our twin-candidate model is superior to the single-candidate model for the task of pronominal anaphora resolution. For the task of coreference resolution, it also performs equally well, or better. © 2008 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Source Title: Computational Linguistics
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/39037
ISSN: 08912017
DOI: 10.1162/coli.2008.07-004-R2-06-57
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Dec 7, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Nov 29, 2017

Page view(s)

53
checked on Dec 4, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.