Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Validation of PDQ-8 as an independent instrument in English and Chinese|
Quality of life
|Source:||Tan, L.C.S., Lau, P.-N., Au, W.-L., Luo, N. (2007). Validation of PDQ-8 as an independent instrument in English and Chinese. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 255 (1-2) : 77-80. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.072|
|Abstract:||Previous validation studies on the PDQ-8, a brief disease-specific quality of life instrument, were performed with the PDQ-8 nested in the original PDQ-39. Such an approach may influence patient responses and the psychometric properties of the PDQ-8. We therefore undertook this study to validate the PDQ-8 when administered independently in English and Chinese and found good item-to-scale correlations (correlation coefficient: 0.44-0.68) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81, 0.87). Factor analyses yielded a component on which all 8 questions were substantially loaded (loading range: 0.55-0.77). Scree plots also showed the one-factor solution thereby validating the PDQ-8 summary index. Construct validation against the Hoehn and Yahr stage and UPDRS motor scores showed significant correlations between higher PDQ-8 summary index and increased disease severity in both English and Chinese versions. Our results show the PDQ-8 to be a valid and reliable disease-specific HRQoL instrument for PD when used independently of the PDQ-39. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Journal of the Neurological Sciences|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Mar 8, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 14, 2018
checked on Mar 12, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.