Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Investigating risky decisions of construction contractors in competitive bid mark-ups
Keywords: bid mark-ups, construction, prospect theory, one-reason decision model, taxonomy
Issue Date: 15-Jul-2010
Citation: BUDI HARTONO (2010-07-15). Investigating risky decisions of construction contractors in competitive bid mark-ups. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: The bid mark-up decision is considered important and complex from a construction contractor?s perspective. This study aims at examining contractors? risky bid mark-up decisions in a competitive bidding setting from a descriptive research school of thought. Grounded to Prospect Theory and One-Reason Decision Model, a contingency-based theoretical framework of three scenarios was developed to explain and to predict bid mark-up decisions in lights of four identified determinants, namely: perceived 'rate of returns', 'revenues', 'project backlogs', and 'project strategic importance'. The three scenarios according to this framework were verified by means of a self-administered survey in Singapore construction industry. By using taxonomic approach, five groups of bidders with distinctive bid profiles were identified and the associated bid mark-ups were calculated. Characteristics of the groups were found in agreement with pertinent scenarios of the theoretical framework. One group of bidders (n=16) supported Scenario 1 of the framework in which participating bidders had considered the reported project bid as having high strategic importance to their organizations and hence made aggressive, low bid mark-ups. Another group (n=4) supported Scenario 2 where bidders deemed the reported projects being non-strategically important and assessed their own companies? project backlogs being above aspirations; and therefore made risk averse, high bid mark-ups. Three different groups (n=22, n=5, and n=3) respectively supported different subsets of Scenario 3 of the framework. Scenario 3 refers to conditions where bidders perceive the observed projects as having low strategic importance and their own companies had performed below aspirations for at least one of the three performance-related determinants and hence made low bid mark-ups. The verified framework could be used by contractors to improve their own bidding strategy in anticipating the likely behavior of the competitors.
Appears in Collections:Ph.D Theses (Open)

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
HartonoB.pdf2.95 MBAdobe PDF



Page view(s)

checked on Oct 14, 2018


checked on Oct 14, 2018

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.