Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis|
|Citation:||Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (2) : 107-122. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00049-X|
|Abstract:||Available studies have not provided a satisfactory answer to the problem of making international comparisons of port efficiency. This study applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) to provide an efficiency measurement for four Australian and twelve other international container ports. While DEA has been applied to a wide number of different situations where efficiency comparisons are required, this technique has not previously been applied to ports. The DEA technique is useful in resolving the measurement of port efficiency because the calculations are non-parametric, can handle more than one output and do not require an explicit a priori determination of relationships between output and inputs, as is required for conventional estimation of efficiency using production functions. The ports of Melbourne, Rotterdam, Yokohama and Osaka are found to be the most inefficient ports in the sample, based on constant and variable returns to scale assumptions, mainly due to the enormous slack in their container berths, terminal area and labor inputs. The study also draws some policy implications for ports and recommends certain areas for future research. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Aug 11, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jul 25, 2018
checked on Jun 23, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.