Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7
Title: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: Secondary analysis of individual variability of depression
Authors: Morres, I.D.
Hinton-Bayre, A.
Motakis, E. 
Carter, T.
Callaghan, P.
Keywords: Depression
Exercise
Individual clinical significance
Preferred intensity
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Morres, I.D., Hinton-Bayre, A., Motakis, E., Carter, T., Callaghan, P. (2019). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in depressed adult women in the United Kingdom: Secondary analysis of individual variability of depression. BMC Public Health 19 (1) : 941. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: This study is a secondary analysis of the trial by Callaghan et al. (2011), which reported higher antidepressant effects for preferred intensity (n = 19) vs. prescribed intensity (n = 19) exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks in depressed women. In particular, the present study sought to examine whether greater clinically significant individual change/recovery was observed in the preferred compared to the prescribed exercise group. Methods: The reliable change index and the Ccutoff score criteria described by Jacobson and Truax (1991) were employed to determine clinical significance. These criteria examined if individual change in depression scores from pre- to post-intervention in the preferred intensity group were statistically significant beyond the standard error of difference derived from the active comparator prescribed group, and subsequently within a normal population range. Patients fulfilling the first or both criteria were classified as improved or recovered, respectively. Results: Post-intervention depression scores of six patients in the preferred intensity exercise group (32%) demonstrated statistically reliable improvement (p < 0.05) and recovery. Half of this subgroup started as moderately depressed. No patient demonstrated a reliable deterioration in depression. Due to a small sample size, it was impossible to determine whether patients on psychiatric medication or medication-free patients were equally benefited from preferred intensity exercise. Thirteen patients in the preferred intensity group (68%) displayed non-statistically significant change in post-intervention depression scores (p > 0.05), although eight of them showed a non-significant improvement in post-intervention depression scores and three could not technically show an improvement in depression due to floor effects (baseline depression within normal range). Conclusions: Preferred intensity exercise of three sessions/week over four weeks led almost a third of the patients to record scores consistent with recovery from depression. Health professionals may consider that short-term preferred intensity exercise provides clinically significant antidepressant effects comparing favourably to exercise on prescription. © 2019 The Author(s).
Source Title: BMC Public Health
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/210757
ISSN: 14712458
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7238-7
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12889-019-7238-7.pdf893.32 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons