Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.12.005
Title: Disputed wind directions: Reinvigorating wind power development in Taiwan
Authors: Valentine, S.V. 
Keywords: Chaos theory
Energy policy
Feed-in tariffs
Taiwan
Wind power
Issue Date: 2010
Source: Valentine, S.V. (2010). Disputed wind directions: Reinvigorating wind power development in Taiwan. Energy for Sustainable Development 14 (1) : 22-34. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.12.005
Abstract: This case study, which analyzes wind power development policy in Taiwan, investigates a theme that is commonly encountered by policy makers in a number of policy settings-how can appropriate policies be developed when two (or more) seemingly valid, yet disparate scientific or technical estimates confound objective analysis? The paper adopts the context of wind power development policy in Taiwan to demonstrate how to employ organizational analysis to identify factors which influence subjective assumptions underpinning disparate estimates of wind power potential and then demonstrates the application of two concepts from chaos theory - fitness landscapes and strategic real options - for guiding policy making despite the existence of technological dissent. In contrast to progressively declining feed-in tariffs that are commonly associated with fledgling renewable energy programs, this study introduces the concept of progressively escalating feed-in tariffs to encourage the development of mature markets-in this case, the Taiwan wind power market. © 2009 International Energy Initiative.
Source Title: Energy for Sustainable Development
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/20882
ISSN: 09730826
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2009.12.005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Dec 5, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Dec 5, 2017

Page view(s)

283
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.