Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Risk taking and metamotivational state
Authors: Howard, R. 
Yan, T.S.
Ling, L.H.
Min, T.S.
Keywords: Arousal seeking
Reversal theory
Risk taking
Issue Date: 2002
Source: Howard, R., Yan, T.S., Ling, L.H., Min, T.S. (2002). Risk taking and metamotivational state. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (1) : 155-165. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: This study investigated the relationship between metamotivational state, as defined in reversal theory, and risk taking in two settings: experimental-analogue (Study 1) and real-life (Study 2). The former employed a card-playing paradigm previously used by [Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295], while the latter used a rock climbing scenario. In Study 1, an attempt was made to induce telic/paratelic and negativist/conformist states prior to the card-playing game, in order to compare risk taking between groups corresponding to four metamotivational blends: negativistic/paratelic, negativistic/telic, conformist/paratelic and conformist/telic. Risk taking was significantly higher in negativistic than in conformist groups. While there was no difference between telic and paratelic states overall, arousal-seeking significantly contributed to greater risk taking. Study 2 compared metamotivational state in experienced versus novice rock climbers, before and after a climb. While both groups were in a paratelic state before and after the climb, the experienced (but not the novice) climbers were predominantly in a negativistic state. It is concluded that a negativistic frame of mind, rather than simply one characterized by arousal seeking, is the most important experiential concomitant of risk taking and should be given due attention when considering risk taking in real-life domains such as driving or sexual behaviour. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Personality and Individual Differences
ISSN: 01918869
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00014-9
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Mar 7, 2018


checked on Feb 5, 2018

Page view(s)

checked on Mar 11, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.