Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115145
DC FieldValue
dc.titleLife cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of PV-powered cooling systems with thermal energy and battery storage for off-grid applications
dc.contributor.authorLuerssen, C
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, O
dc.contributor.authorReindl, T
dc.contributor.authorSekhar, C
dc.contributor.authorCheong, D
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T08:06:32Z
dc.date.available2020-08-31T08:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.identifier.citationLuerssen, C, Gandhi, O, Reindl, T, Sekhar, C, Cheong, D (2020-09-01). Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of PV-powered cooling systems with thermal energy and battery storage for off-grid applications. Applied Energy 273 : 115145-115145. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115145
dc.identifier.issn03062619
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/173671
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Ltd In this paper, we determine the optimised life cycle cost (LCC) of PV-powered cooling systems for three off-grid applications, namely a remote eco-resort, a hotel, and a refrigerated warehouse. We focus our work on the comparison of seven different system configurations with battery and thermal energy storages (chilled water and ice), as well as a combination of both to a purely diesel-powered baseline case. Therefore, we set up energy simulation and LCC models in TRNSYS and carried out multi-parameter optimisations for each system configuration and scenario. The results show that adding PV to the diesel generator reduces the LCC by 9–10%, while additional batteries reduce the LCC further for all scenarios – 14–17% compared to the diesel-powered baseline. Although thermal energy storages on their own cannot compete with battery storage, a combination of both can yield competitive LCC. Moreover, the optimised cases with a combination of battery and thermal energy storage oer the highest fuel cost savings of 51–77% compared to the baseline case, while the optimised cases with just battery only yield 39–48%. However, the investment is 27–50% higher for the system with a combination of thermal energy storage and battery compared to the configurations with only battery storage. To validate the results and the chosen parameters thorough sensitivity analyses were conducted. The analyses show that the LCC are especially influenced by financial parameters, namely fuel price, fuel price escalation and the discount rate.
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2020-07-22T07:14:24Z
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.departmentSOLAR ENERGY RESEARCH INST OF S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115145
dc.description.sourcetitleApplied Energy
dc.description.volume273
dc.description.page115145-115145
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of PV-powered cooling systems with thermal energy and battery storage for off-grid applications.pdfPublished version4.97 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.