Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/15332
Title: If and Hook
Authors: TANG WENG HONG
Keywords: Grice, implicature, conditional, conversation, pragmatics, logic
Issue Date: 17-Jul-2006
Source: TANG WENG HONG (2006-07-17). If and Hook. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: In my thesis, I defend a particular semantic account of the indicative conditional, namely, the thesis (call it the "horseshoe thesis") that the indicative conditional is synonymous with the material conditional. I provide three direct arguments for the claim that the indicative conditional is logically equivalent to the material conditional. Drawing from the work of Paul Grice, I also defend the claim against various purported counterexamples, including the paradoxes of material implication. Grice is known for defending the horseshoe thesis against such purported counterexamples by appealing to his conversational maxims and the phenomenon of conversational implicature. What is not so well known is that he has another line of defence that does not appeal to the maxims. I show that this second line of defence deals with a certain problem which his first line does not handle well. I also answer various other objections directed against Grice's defence of the horseshoe thesis.
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/15332
Appears in Collections:Master's Theses (Open)

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
WHTang.pdf268.69 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Page view(s)

394
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Download(s)

273
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.