Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/133378
Title: Intraperitoneal vancomycin/oral pefloxacin versus intraperitoneal vancomycin/gentamicin in the treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis
Authors: Lye, W.-C.
Lee, E.J.C. 
van der Straaten, J.
Keywords: Gentamicin
Pefloxacin
Peritonitis
Vancomycin
Issue Date: 1993
Source: Lye, W.-C., Lee, E.J.C., van der Straaten, J. (1993). Intraperitoneal vancomycin/oral pefloxacin versus intraperitoneal vancomycin/gentamicin in the treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis. Peritoneal Dialysis International 13 (SUPPL. 2) : S348-S350. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Sixty patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of two different regimens for the empirical treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) peritonitis. At presentation, Group I received intraperitoneal vancomycin (1 g) and oral pefloxacin (400 mg b.i.d.), and Group II intraperitoneal vancomycin (1 g) and gentamicin (80 mg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/2 L). Treatment duration was 14 days. Despite randomization, Group I had significantly more patients with primary Candida peritonitis. When fungal peritonitis was excluded from analysis, there were no significant differences in the treatment success rate (Group I, 73.3% vs Group II, 80.0%, p=NS), number of relapses (Group I, 0 vs Group II,1), and Tenckhoff catheter removal rates (Group I, 26.6% vs Group II,16.6%, p=NS) between the two groups. The patients treated with pefloxacin had an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting. In selected situations oral pefloxacin may be a suitable substitute for intraperitoneal gentamicin as outpatient therapy for CAPD peritonitis.
Source Title: Peritoneal Dialysis International
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/133378
ISSN: 08968608
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

13
checked on Jan 13, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.