Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: Comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences|
|Authors:||Pui, M.H. |
magnetic resonance imaging
|Citation:||Pui, M.H., Goh, P.S., Choo, H.F., Fok, E.C.M. (1997). Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: Comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Australasian Radiology 41 (2) : 99-102. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||Fat-saturation (FS) pulse sequences can improve the detection of musculoskeletal lesions. We prospectively compared contrast-enhanced T1- weighted FS spin-echo (SE) images, T2-weighted FS fast spin-echo (FSE) images and inversion recovery (IR) FSE images to determine if any of these three pulse sequences is superior for depicting bone marrow and soft tissue lesions. T1-weighted FS-SE images (400-680/10-20 [TR/TE]) after intravenous injection of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), T2- weighted FS-FSE (2400-4200/96-112) and IR-FSE (3700-6000/12-14/170 [TR/TE/TI]) images were obtained with a 1.5-T magnet system in 35 patients. The visibility, margination and extent of 37 bone marrow and 67 soft tissue lesions, image uniformity, susceptibility and motion artefacts were qualitatively analysed by four radiologists. The number and size of lesions detected, the mean lesion signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) were also statistically compared. More bone and soft-tissue lesions were detected on the IR-FSE and T2-weighted FS-FSE than the T1- weighted FS-SE images. The IR-FSE images were significantly better than the T2-weighted FS-FSE and T1-weighted FS-SE images for bone marrow lesion conspicuity (P|
|Source Title:||Australasian Radiology|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 8, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.