Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/130247
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThere Is No Best Method-Why?
dc.contributor.authorPrabhu, N.S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-16T11:03:55Z
dc.date.available2016-11-16T11:03:55Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.citationPrabhu, N.S. (1990). There Is No Best Method-Why?. TESOL Quarterly 24 (2) : 161-176. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00398322
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/130247
dc.description.abstractThe often-heard viewpoint that there is no one best method for language instruction is considered. The propositional context of this statement is emphasized, & an attempt is made to clarify the sense in which this statement can be viewed as accurate. Three arguments in support of this theory are proposed: (1) it depends on the teaching situation, (2) all methods have some validity, & (3) it is necessary to reconsider the term "best." It is concluded that instead of searching for a best method, it may be more helpful to look for ways in which teachers' & specialists' viewpoints can interact. J. Sihvola.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentENGLISH LANGUAGE & LITERATURE
dc.description.sourcetitleTESOL Quarterly
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page161-176
dc.description.codenTESQA
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.