Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.473.x
Title: Reasons, resultance and moral particularism
Authors: Moad, O.E. 
Issue Date: Jan-2007
Citation: Moad, O.E. (2007-01). Reasons, resultance and moral particularism. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226) : 112-116. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.473.x
Abstract: According to Jonathan Dancy's moral particularism, the way in which a given moral reason functions as a reason for or against an action can vary from case to case. Dancy also asserts that reasons are resultance bases. But a reason why something ought to be done is that in virtue of which it is something that ought to be done. If the function fa reason can vary, then resultance bases cannot be reasons. Perhaps the particularist might conceive a reason not as a resultance base, but as a specific type of which a resultance base is a token. But this picture of reasons cannot be correct. © 2007 The Author.
Source Title: Philosophical Quarterly
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/130150
ISSN: 00318094
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.473.x
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Dec 11, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Dec 11, 2018

Page view(s)

22
checked on Sep 28, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.