Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Causatives and Universal Grammar: An Alternative Interpretation|
|Source:||Song, J.J. (1991). Causatives and Universal Grammar: An Alternative Interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society 89 (1) : 65-94. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.|
|Abstract:||The validity of the case hierarchy (CH), the paradigm case & the notion of demotion in Bernard Comrie's universal theory of causative constructions ("Causatives & Universal Grammar," Transactions of the Philological Society, 1974, 1-32) is questioned. It is argued that the CH theory precludes a more realistic understanding of the causative construction. Data from a variety of languages are examined & it is shown that few if any languages conform to Comrie's paradigm case. The alternative view is proposed that both causative & noncausative sentences are susceptible to the same NP density control - ie, a mechanism that keeps the number of core NPs or arguments in the causative sentence from exceeding the maximum number of core NPs/arguments permitted in a noncausative sentence. It is argued that the CH theory is not needed to account for causative constructions.|
|Source Title:||Transactions of the Philological Society|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 17, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.