Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The REMEDEE trial: A randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent
Authors: Haude, M.
Lee, S.W.L.
Worthley, S.G.
Silber, S.
Verheye, S.
Erbs, S.
Rosli, M.A.
Botelho, R.
Meredith, I.
Sim, K.H.
Stella, P.R.
Tan, H.-C. 
Whitbourn, R.
Thambar, S.
Abizaid, A.
Koh, T.H.
Den Heijer, P.
Parise, H.
Cristea, E.
Maehara, A.
Mehran, R.
Keywords: DES
EPC capture stent
Issue Date: Apr-2013
Citation: Haude, M., Lee, S.W.L., Worthley, S.G., Silber, S., Verheye, S., Erbs, S., Rosli, M.A., Botelho, R., Meredith, I., Sim, K.H., Stella, P.R., Tan, H.-C., Whitbourn, R., Thambar, S., Abizaid, A., Koh, T.H., Den Heijer, P., Parise, H., Cristea, E., Maehara, A., Mehran, R. (2013-04). The REMEDEE trial: A randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 6 (4) : 334-343. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Objectives: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety results after coronary implantation of a combined sirolimus-eluting CD34 antibody coated Combo stent (OrbusNeich Medical, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida) with the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). This report summarizes the first-in-man randomized, controlled multicenter REMEDEE trial (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coatED bio-Engineered StEnt) angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical results up to 12 months. Background: Drug-eluting stents have limited restenosis and reintervention but are complicated by especially late and very late stent thrombosis and accelerated neoatherosclerosis. Alternative or adjunct technologies should address these limitations. Methods: One hundred eighty-three patients with de novo native coronary artery stenoses were randomized 2:1 to Combo stent or PES implantation. The primary endpoint is the angiographic in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months, which was tested for noninferiority between the 2 stent groups. Secondary endpoints include the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. Results: The Combo stent was found to be noninferior to the PES in 9-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss with 0.39 ± 0.45 mm versus 0.44 ± 0.56 mm (pnoninferiority = 0.0012). At 12 months, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events was 8.9% in the Combo group and 10.2% in the PES group (p = 0.80) with no difference in mortality, occurrence of myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. No stent thrombosis was reported in either group. Conclusions: In the REMEDEE trial the Combo stent has shown to be effective by meeting the primary noninferiority angiographic endpoint and safe, with an overall low rate of clinical events in both stent groups, including no stent thrombosis up to 12 months. © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Source Title: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
ISSN: 19368798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.018
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Jan 15, 2019


checked on Jan 7, 2019

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 18, 2019

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.