Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention|
|Citation:||Fearon, W.F., Low, A.F., Yong, A.S., McGeoch, R., Berry, C., Shah, M.G., Ho, M.Y., Kim, H.-S., Loh, J.P., Oldroyd, K.G. (2013-06-18). Prognostic value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 127 (24) : 2436-2441. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000298|
|Abstract:||Background: Most methods for assessing microvascular function are not readily available in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The aim of this study is to determine whether the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR), measured at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, is predictive of death and rehospitalization for heart failure. Methods and Results: IMR was measured immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 253 patients from 3 institutions with the use of a pressure-temperature sensor wire. The primary end point was the rate of death or rehospitalization for heart failure. The prognostic value of IMR was compared with coronary flow reserve, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade, and clinical variables. The mean IMR was 40.3±32.5. Patients with an IMR >40 had a higher rate of the primary end point at 1 year than patients with an IMR ≥40 (17.1% versus 6.6%; P=0.027). During a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, 13.8% experienced the primary end point and 4.3% died. An IMR >40 was associated with an increased risk of death or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; P=0.034) and of death alone (HR, 3.95; P=0.028). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of death or rehospitalization for heart failure included IMR >40 (HR, 2.2; P=0.026), fractional flow reserve ≤0.8 (HR, 3.24; P=0.008), and diabetes mellitus (HR, 4.4; P40 was the only independent predictor of death alone (HR, 4.3; P=0.02). Conclusions: An elevated IMR at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention predicts poor long-term outcomes. © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc.|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jun 18, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jun 18, 2018
checked on May 17, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.