Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||How unique is east asian modernity?|
|Citation:||Schmidt, V.H. (2011). How unique is east asian modernity?. Asian Journal of Social Science 39 (3) : 304-331. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X577596|
|Abstract:||The article examines Shmuel Eisenstadt's claim that Japan constitutes a unique modernity, one that differs fundamentally from Western modernity. Since this claim, like the multiple modernities approach founded by Eisenstadt, is directed against the convergence thesis of classical modernisation theory, that thesis' meaning is first briefly reconstructed. Moreover, to stand Eisenstadt's case on a broader basis, the four tiger states (South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore) are added to the sample, thus extending Japanese modernity to a larger East Asian modernity. These five countries are then compared with the five largest Western countries along several dimensions that seem to be particularly salient for probing modernisation theory. Surprisingly, the comparison fully confirms the theory. The article then moves on to assess Eisenstadt's claim in light of his own conceptualisation of modernity. This conceptualisation renders his proposal more plausible, but at considerable cost. The conclusion is devoted to asking how Eisenstadt's substantive concerns could be met without reading too much into his empirical findings. © 2011 Brill NV, Leiden.|
|Source Title:||Asian Journal of Social Science|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jun 15, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 21, 2018
checked on Mar 11, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.