Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.13.8679
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCharacterization of a novel mammalian RGS protein that binds to Gα proteins and inhibits pheromone signaling in yeast
dc.contributor.authorChen, C.
dc.contributor.authorZheng, B.
dc.contributor.authorHan, J.
dc.contributor.authorLin, S.-C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T07:47:36Z
dc.date.available2014-12-12T07:47:36Z
dc.date.issued1997-03-28
dc.identifier.citationChen, C., Zheng, B., Han, J., Lin, S.-C. (1997-03-28). Characterization of a novel mammalian RGS protein that binds to Gα proteins and inhibits pheromone signaling in yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272 (13) : 8679-8685. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.13.8679
dc.identifier.issn00219258
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/116250
dc.description.abstractGenetic studies of molecules that negatively regulate G-coupled receptor functions have led to the identification of a large gene family with an evolutionarily conserved domain, termed the RGS domain. It is now understood that RGS proteins serve as GTPase-activating proteins for subfamilies of the heterotrimeric G-proteins. We have isolated from mouse pituitary a full- length cDNA clone encoding a novel member of the RGS protein family, termed RGS16, as well as the full-length cDNA of mRGS5 and mRGS2. Tissue distribution analysis shows that the novel RGS16 is predominantly expressed in liver and pituitary, and that RGS5 is preferentially expressed in heart and skeletal muscle. In contrast, RGS2 is widely expressed. Genetic analysis using the pheromone response halo assay and FUS1 gene induction assay show that overexpression of the RGS16 gene dramatically inhibits yeast response to α-factor, whereas neither RGS2 nor RGS5 has any discernible effect on pheromone sensitivity, pointing to a possible functional diversity among RGS proteins. In vitro binding assays reveal that RGS5 and RGS16 bind to Gα(i) and Gα(o) subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins, but not to Gα(s). Based on mutational analysis of the conserved residues in the RGS domain, we suggest that the G-protein binding and GTPase-activating protein activity may involve distinct functional structures of the RGS proteins, indicating that RGS proteins may exert a dual function in the attenuation of signaling via G- coupled receptors.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.13.8679
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR & CELL BIOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1074/jbc.272.13.8679
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Biological Chemistry
dc.description.volume272
dc.description.issue13
dc.description.page8679-8685
dc.description.codenJBCHA
dc.identifier.isiutA1997WQ63500083
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.