Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/713662180
Title: Letters to workmen? Fors Clavigera, Whistler vs. Ruskin and Sage criticism in crisis
Authors: Leng, A. 
Keywords: Fors Clavigera
Periodicals
Ruskin
Sage criticism
Self-contradiction
Whistler
Issue Date: 2001
Source: Leng, A. (2001). Letters to workmen? Fors Clavigera, Whistler vs. Ruskin and Sage criticism in crisis. Prose Studies 24 (1) : 63-92+v. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/713662180
Abstract: Questioning recent critics' rehabilitation of Fors Clavigera, this article argues that because its defining features were extreme violence and self-contradiction, Ruskin's epistolary periodical was doomed to the disaster that befell it when Whistler sued him for libel. For whilst targeting artisan readers, Fors betrayed their trust with its prohibitive pricing and sales methods, incoherence, cryptic and coercive confessionalism, and Carlylean misanthropy towards subjects and correspondents alike. Thus, echoing Blackwood's notorious persecution of Keats, Fors branded Whistler and the evolutionist Huxley "Cockneys," and Ruskin fatally regressed to the level of the scurrilous periodical reviewers against whom his identity as "sage" had always been defined.
Source Title: Prose Studies
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/114738
ISSN: 17439426
DOI: 10.1080/713662180
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Feb 21, 2018

Page view(s)

57
checked on Feb 24, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.