Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs|
|Citation:||Phelps, J., Friess, D.A., Webb, E.L. (2012-10). Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs. Biological Conservation 154 : 53-60. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.031|
|Abstract:||Recent practise has revealed that conservation interventions that seek to achieve multiple benefits generally face significant, if under-recognized trade-offs. REDD+ policies present prospective win-win solutions for climate change mitigation, rural development and biodiversity conservation. Notably, protecting, enhancing and restoring forests for their carbon sequestration services has the potential to additionally promote the conservation of imperiled tropical biodiversity. However, it has become increasingly apparent that efforts to design a REDD+ mechanism that optimizes emissions reductions and associated co-benefits face significant environmental and economic trade-offs. We provide a framework for conceptualizing the major related policy options, presenting the associated trade-offs as a continuum and as functions of two key factors: (1) geographic targeting, and (2) the selection of specific forest management activities. Our analysis highlights the challenges of assessing trade-offs using existing data and valuation schemes, and the difficulty of paying for and legislating biodiversity co-benefits and safeguards within a future REDD+ mechanism. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.|
|Source Title:||Biological Conservation|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jun 18, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jun 6, 2018
checked on Jun 22, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.