Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01531.x
Title: Diagnostic utility of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16) in the elderly
Authors: Doraiswamy, P.M.
Bernstein, I.H.
Rush, A.J. 
Kyutoku, Y.
Carmody, T.J.
MacLeod, L.
Venkatraman, S.
Burks, M.
Stegman, D.
Witte, B.
Trivedi, M.H.
Keywords: depression
diagnosis
elderly
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-rated
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report
screening
Issue Date: Sep-2010
Citation: Doraiswamy, P.M., Bernstein, I.H., Rush, A.J., Kyutoku, Y., Carmody, T.J., MacLeod, L., Venkatraman, S., Burks, M., Stegman, D., Witte, B., Trivedi, M.H. (2010-09). Diagnostic utility of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16) in the elderly. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 122 (3) : 226-234. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01531.x
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate psychometric properties and comparability ability of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) vs. the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-rated (QIDS-C16) and Self-report (QIDS-SR16) scales to detect a current major depressive episode in the elderly. Method: Community and clinic subjects (age ≥60 years) were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) for DSM-IV and three depression scales randomly. Statistics included classical test and Samejima item response theories, factor analyzes, and receiver operating characteristic methods. Results: In 229 elderly patients (mean age = 73 years, 39% male, 54% current depression), all three scales were unidimensional and with nearly equal Cronbach α reliability (0.85-0.89). Each scale discriminated persons with major depression from the non-depressed, but the QIDS-C 16 was slightly more accurate. Conclusion: All three tests are valid for detecting geriatric major depression with the QIDS-C16 being slightly better. Self-rated QIDS-SR16 is recommended as a screening tool as it is least expensive and least time consuming. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Source Title: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110521
ISSN: 0001690X
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01531.x
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Sep 23, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on Sep 12, 2018

Page view(s)

21
checked on Apr 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.