Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Clinical Reasoning in the Real World Is Mediated by Bounded Rationality: Implications for Diagnostic Clinical Practice Guidelines|
|Authors:||Bonilauri Ferreira, A.P.R.|
|Citation:||Bonilauri Ferreira, A.P.R., Ferreira, R.F., Rajgor, D., Shah, J., Menezes, A., Pietrobon, R. (2010). Clinical Reasoning in the Real World Is Mediated by Bounded Rationality: Implications for Diagnostic Clinical Practice Guidelines. PLoS ONE 5 (4) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010265|
|Abstract:||Background: Little is known about the reasoning mechanisms used by physicians in decision-making and how this compares to diagnostic clinical practice guidelines. We explored the clinical reasoning process in a real life environment. Method: This is a qualitative study evaluating transcriptions of sixteen physicians' reasoning during appointments with patients, clinical discussions between specialists, and personal interviews with physicians affiliated to a hospital in Brazil. Results: Four main themes were identified: simple and robust heuristics, extensive use of social environment rationality, attempts to prove diagnostic and therapeutic hypothesis while refuting potential contradictions using positive test strategy, and reaching the saturation point. Physicians constantly attempted to prove their initial hypothesis while trying to refute any contradictions. While social environment rationality was the main factor in the determination of all steps of the clinical reasoning process, factors such as referral letters and number of contradictions associated with the initial hypothesis had influence on physicians' confidence and determination of the threshold to reach a final decision. Discussion: Physicians rely on simple heuristics associated with environmental factors. This model allows for robustness, simplicity, and cognitive energy saving. Since this model does not fit into current diagnostic clinical practice guidelines, we make some propositions to help its integration. Copyright: © 2010 Bonilauri Ferreira et al.|
|Source Title:||PLoS ONE|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 13, 2019
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 4, 2019
checked on Dec 7, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.