Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Achieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies|
|Citation:||Zaveri, A., Cofiel, L., Shah, J., Pradhan, S., Chan, E., Dameron, O., Pietrobon, R., Ang, B.T. (2010-12). Achieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies. Neuroinformatics 8 (4) : 261-271. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5|
|Abstract:||Systematic reviews and meta-analyses constitute one of the central pillars of evidence-based medicine. However, clinical trials are poorly reported which delays meta-analyses and consequently the translation of clinical research findings to clinical practice. We propose a Center of Excellence in Research Reporting in Neurosurgery (CERR-N) and the creation of a clinically significant computational ontology to encode Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) studies in neurosurgery. A 128 element strong computational ontology was derived from the Trial Bank ontology by omitting classes which were not required to perform meta-analysis. Three researchers from our team tagged five randomly selected RCT's each, published in the last 5 years (2004-2008), in the Journal of Neurosurgery (JoN), Neurosurgery Journal (NJ) and Journal of Neurotrauma (JoNT). We evaluated inter and intra observer reliability for the ontology using percent agreement and kappa coefficient. The inter-observer agreement was 76.4%, 75.97% and 74.9% and intra-observer agreement was 89.8%, 80.8% and 86.56% for JoN, NJ and JoNT respectively. The inter-observer kappa coefficient was 0.60, 0.54 and 0.53 and the intra-observer kappa coefficient was 0.79, 0.82 and 0.79 for JoN, NJ and JoNT journals respectively. The high degree of inter and intra-observer agreement confirms tagging consistency in sections of a given scientific manuscript. Standardizing reporting for neurosurgery articles can be reliably achieved through the integration of a computational ontology within the context of a CERR-N. This approach holds potential for the overall improvement in the quality of reporting of RCTs in neurosurgery, ultimately streamlining the translation of clinical research findings to improvement in patient care. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Sep 17, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Aug 29, 2018
checked on May 11, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.