Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.005
Title: Physician communication techniques and weight loss in adults: Project CHAT
Authors: Pollak, K.I.
Alexander, S.C.
Coffman, C.J.
Tulsky, J.A.
Lyna, P.
Dolor, R.J.
James, I.E.
Brouwer, R.J.N.
Manusov, J.R.E.
Østbye, T. 
Issue Date: Oct-2010
Citation: Pollak, K.I., Alexander, S.C., Coffman, C.J., Tulsky, J.A., Lyna, P., Dolor, R.J., James, I.E., Brouwer, R.J.N., Manusov, J.R.E., Østbye, T. (2010-10). Physician communication techniques and weight loss in adults: Project CHAT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 39 (4) : 321-328. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.005
Abstract: Background Physicians are encouraged to counsel overweight and obese patients to lose weight. Purpose It was examined whether discussing weight and use of motivational interviewing techniques (e.g., collaborating, reflective listening) while discussing weight predicted weight loss 3 months after the encounter. Methods Forty primary care physicians and 461 of their overweight or obese patient visits were audio recorded between December 2006 and June 2008. Patient actual weight at the encounter and 3 months after the encounter (n=426); whether weight was discussed; physicians' use of motivational interviewing techniques; and patient, physician, and visit covariates (e.g., race, age, specialty) were assessed. This was an observational study and data were analyzed in April 2009. Results No differences in weight loss were found between patients whose physicians discussed weight or did not. Patients whose physicians used motivational interviewingconsistent techniques during weight-related discussions lost weight 3 months post-encounter; those whose physician used motivational interviewinginconsistent techniques gained or maintained weight. The estimated difference in weight change between patients whose physician had a higher global motivational interviewingSpirit score (e.g., collaborated with patient) and those whose physician had a lower score was 1.6 kg (95% CI=-2.9, -0.3, p=0.02). The same was true for patients whose physician used reflective statements: 0.9 kg (95% CI=-1.8, -0.1, p=0.03). Similarly, patients whose physicians expressed only motivational interviewingconsistent behaviors had a difference in weight change of 1.1 kg (95% CI=-2.3, 0.1, p=0.07) compared to those whose physician expressed only motivational interviewinginconsistent behaviors (e.g., judging, confronting). Conclusions In this observational study, use of motivational interviewing techniques during weight loss discussions predicted patient weight loss. © 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Source Title: American Journal of Preventive Medicine
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110212
ISSN: 07493797
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

81
checked on Sep 17, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

77
checked on Aug 29, 2018

Page view(s)

38
checked on Aug 23, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.