Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.101
Title: Comparative evaluation of software for retention time alignment of gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based metabonomic data
Authors: Koh, Y.
Pasikanti, K.K.
Yap, C.W. 
Chan, E.C.Y. 
Keywords: Data processing
Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
Metabolomics
Metabonomics
Peak alignment
Retention time alignment
Issue Date: 24-Dec-2010
Source: Koh, Y., Pasikanti, K.K., Yap, C.W., Chan, E.C.Y. (2010-12-24). Comparative evaluation of software for retention time alignment of gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based metabonomic data. Journal of Chromatography A 1217 (52) : 8308-8316. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.101
Abstract: In chromatography-based metabonomic research, retention time (RT) alignment of chromatographic peaks poses a challenge for the accurate profiling of biomarkers. Although a number of RT alignment software has been reported, the performance of these software packages have not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the RT alignment accuracy of publicly available and commercial RT alignment software. Two gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) datasets acquired from a mixture of standard metabolites and human bladder cancer urine samples, were used to assess three publicly available software packages, MetAlign, MZmine and TagFinder, and two commercial applications comprising the Calibration feature and Statistical Compare of ChromaTOF software. The overall RT alignment accuracies in aligning standard compounds mixture were 93, 92, 74, 73 and 42% for Calibration feature, MZmine, MetAlign, Statistical Compare and TagFinder, respectively. Additionally, unique trends were observed for the individual software with regards to the different experimental conditions related to extent and direction of RT shifts. Conflicting performance was observed for human urine samples suggesting that RT misalignments still occurred despite the use of RT alignment software. While RT alignment remains an inevitable step in data preprocessing, metabonomic researchers are recommended to perform manual check on the RT alignment of important biomarkers as part of their validation process. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.
Source Title: Journal of Chromatography A
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/105750
ISSN: 00219673
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.101
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Feb 13, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on Nov 21, 2017

Page view(s)

34
checked on Feb 17, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.