Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.002
Title: Aprepitant for Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: An Economic Analysis for Singapore
Authors: Lopes, G.
Burke, T.
Pellissier, J.
Zhang, X.-H.
Dedhiya, S.
Chan, A. 
Keywords: Aprepitant
Chemotherapy
Cost-effectiveness
Emesis
Singapore
Issue Date: May-2012
Citation: Lopes, G.,Burke, T.,Pellissier, J.,Zhang, X.-H.,Dedhiya, S.,Chan, A. (2012-05). Aprepitant for Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: An Economic Analysis for Singapore. Value in Health Regional Issues 1 (1) : 66-74. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.002
Abstract: Background: Aprepitant (a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist), in combination with a serotonin receptor antagonist (5-HT3 RA) and dexamethasone, has demonstrated superior efficacy on end points related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) compared with standard care (combination 5-HT3 RA and dexamethasone).Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of an aprepitant-containing regimen compared with current clinical practice for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in Singapore. Methods: A decision-analytic model was constructed to assess the costs and outcomes associated with an aprepitant-containing regimen compared with standard care in the prevention of CINV following HEC. Three scenarios were modeled on the basis of results of four double-blind randomized clinical trials of aprepitant. CINV event probabilities were calculated on the basis of the occurrence of nausea and vomiting and the need for rescue medication in the 5 days following a single cycle of HEC. The analysis was conducted from the Singapore health care system perspective. Results: Aprepitant reduced emesis and nausea, resulting in small but clinically important improvements when measured in quality-adjusted life-years. The aprepitant-containing regimen was associated with higher acquisition costs but lower costs relating to patient management, hospitalization, and use of rescue medication. Across the scenarios, the incremental cost per emetic event avoided ranged from cost saving to Singapore $63 (US $51). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranged from cost saving to Singapore $49,800 per quality-adjusted life-year gained (US $40,600). The analysis was relatively insensitive to changes in the inputs. Conclusions: Aprepitant is a clinically important and cost-effective therapy for the prevention of CINV in patients treated with HEC in Singapore. © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).
Source Title: Value in Health Regional Issues
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/105676
ISSN: 22121099
DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Oct 15, 2018

Page view(s)

41
checked on Sep 28, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.