Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.09.005
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGHICA - Risk analysis with GH distributions and independent components
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y.
dc.contributor.authorHärdle, W.
dc.contributor.authorSpokoiny, V.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T05:12:24Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T05:12:24Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.identifier.citationChen, Y., Härdle, W., Spokoiny, V. (2010-03). GHICA - Risk analysis with GH distributions and independent components. Journal of Empirical Finance 17 (2) : 255-269. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.09.005
dc.identifier.issn09275398
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/105162
dc.description.abstractOver recent years, a study on risk management has been prompted by the Basel committee for regular banking supervisory. There are however limitations of some widely-used risk management methods that either calculate risk measures under the Gaussian distributional assumption or involve numerical difficulty. The primary aim of this paper is to present a realistic and fast method, GHICA, which overcomes the limitations in multivariate risk analysis. The idea is to first retrieve independent components (ICs) out of the observed high-dimensional time series and then individually and adaptively fit the resulting ICs in the generalized hyperbolic (GH) distributional framework. For the volatility estimation of each IC, the local exponential smoothing technique is used to achieve the best possible accuracy of estimation. Finally, the fast Fourier transformation technique is used to approximate the density of the portfolio returns. The proposed GHICA method is applicable to covariance estimation as well. It is compared with the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) method based on the simulated data with d = 50 GH distributed components. We further implement the GHICA method to calculate risk measures given 20-dimensional German DAX portfolios and a dynamic exchange rate portfolio. Several alternative methods are considered as well to compare the accuracy of calculation with the GHICA one. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.09.005
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectExpected shortfall
dc.subjectGeneralized hyperbolic distribution
dc.subjectIndependent component analysis
dc.subjectLocal exponential estimation
dc.subjectMultivariate risk management
dc.subjectValue at risk
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSTATISTICS & APPLIED PROBABILITY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.09.005
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Empirical Finance
dc.description.volume17
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page255-269
dc.description.codenJEFIE
dc.identifier.isiut000276124200006
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.